Showing posts with label Liability. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liability. Show all posts

Monday, August 5, 2013

Smart Insurance Coverage This Summer

Sure, the risk of severe storms and natural disasters increases during the summer months, but there are also plenty of "hidden dangers" you may not always consider. If you're not adequately protected against them, you could find yourself in the middle of an insurance storm.

 
Property Insurance Covers More Than Your Home


Home damage caused by intense thunder storms accounts for many homeowner's insurance claims over the warmer months, but so much more can go wrong in and around your home.
 
Things like bicycles, high-end camping gear, and the cameras you use to record your adventures are expensive items that can be damaged in a catastrophe or fall victim to theft. Luckily, they're often covered by your homeowners insurance or renters insurance policy. But as you accumulate these kinds of goodies over time, it's important to verify that your coverage levels still meet your needs—speaking to your insurance agent is an easy way to make sure your coverage is keeping up with your lifestyle.
 
Should the unexpected occur, you'll want to have all the information you need to file your claim.
 
Going Above and Beyond Your Policy Limits
 
What if a wayward sparkler on the 4th of July caused a burn or set a flammable item on fire? Or how about a backyard BBQ where a faulty grill leads to mayhem?
 
Consider the additional level of protection that comes with a Personal Umbrella Policy. A personal umbrella policy provides liability coverage over and above your standard auto insurance or homeowners insurance. Basically, it offers protection against large and potentially devastating liability claims or judgments, kicking in right where your other liability coverage stops.
 
A personal umbrella policy's added protection is a great safeguard if you own a pool, but don't ignore the other potential dangers lurking around your house.
 
Two-Wheeled Trips Call for Motorcycle Insurance
 
As the weather gets warmer, the open road calls. Unfortunately, so do nearly 100,000 annual motorcycle accidents and injuries. One way to protect yourself is making sure you use the right safety gear every time you ride.
 
Your auto insurance won't help you on a motorcycle. You'll need motorcycle insurance that protects your bike—and also protects you.
 
Your Home on Wheels Needs Fixed Protection
 
If your summer travel plans include an RV or motor home, remember that these special vehicles fall outside the coverage of your regular auto insurance. The good news is that motor home insurance offers specialized protection for you and your family, and even the contents inside.
 
Plan for Your 4-Wheeled Fun
 
Many people don't think to insure their all-terrain and off-road vehicles. While their relative size may be small, they can come with outsized price tags. And with so many dips, jumps, turns, and outdoor hazards (like tree limbs!), there's no shortage of things that can go wrong. Off-road vehicle insurance can help protect your investment whether you're riding on back trails in the woods or on the back.
 
Get Covered Before You Get Drenched
 
When you set out to boat, you've got more than just fueling your tank to think about. Fun on the water also means having the right safety equipment, emergency service plan, and wreck coverage ready in case you need it.
 
Head over to the Boccarossa Insurance Agency to find out how we can provide you with the coverage that fits your needs.

Monday, June 24, 2013

Some Small Businesses Choose to Self-Insure

NorthBay Adventure is just the kind of small business that could be expected to buy medical insurance for workers under health act rules taking effect in 2014. But Executive Director George Comfort says that's not likely to happen.

Instead, NorthBay became self-insured last year, paying most workers' health costs directly, a practice more typical of large employers. The decision to self-insure was about free choice, savings and what's best for his company, Comfort says.

But others see it as a threat to the Affordable Care Act. As more small employers such as NorthBay avoid the act's requirements through self-coverage, small-business marketplaces intended to cover millions of Americans could break down and become unaffordable, they say.
"What you've got is basically a loophole for the small employer to get out of the ACA requirements," says Robert Laszewski, a Virginia-based consultant and former insurance executive.

To employees, medical self-insurance looks like a regular health plan. Self-insured employers pay for most worker health costs directly, though they contract with an insurer or other company to administer claims. The employers also buy coverage known as stop-loss for claims exceeding a certain amount. Brokers say a growing number of firms see such plans as low-cost alternatives to conventional coverage, as they're exempt from ACA requirements such as insurance taxes and specified benefits.

NorthBay, which is based in Maryland and delivers outdoors education to sixth-graders, saves some 45% on self-insured health costs for its 60 or so covered employees compared with the price of regular coverage, Comfort says. "We have a very young workforce," Comfort says. "Our average age is at or below 30. We have a very healthy group."

But if too many small companies take a similar route, insurance plans for small businesses will be stuck with older and sicker members, say policy scholars.

Under some conditions, such a dynamic could drive up the cost of traditional insurance by as much as 25%, says Matthew Buettgens, a researcher at the Urban Institute.

"If it becomes too easy to self-insure, you're inviting employers to choose one kind of coverage if their workers are healthy and a different kind of coverage if they're sick," says Mark Hall, a law professor at Wake Forest University.

Facing a conundrum

That undermines a basic feature of the exchanges: the "community rating" that obligates insurers to offer similar prices to all comers, spreading the cost of care among well and sick alike. In a worst-case scenario, small employers will self-insure when workers are healthy, avoiding community rating, then immediately buy price-controlled coverage on the exchanges if someone is gravely ill.

Health-act advocates especially worry that firms with fewer than 50 employees will self-insure. Those companies aren't required to offer policies under the health law, but many are expected to buy in online marketplaces, called exchanges, scheduled to open in October.

However, self-insurance might be the only way some struggling employers can afford medical coverage, says Michael Ferguson, chief operating officer at the Self-Insurance Institute of America, an industry group.

Even so, he disputes the notion that firms and stop-loss companies can "cherry pick" the system by self-insuring only when workers appear healthy. Even young people have accidents and get sick. He says companies often know less about employees' health than they think.

"The idea about employers gaming the system is just a canard," he says.

The key to self-insurance for small companies is stop-loss coverage, which often kicks in when medical costs per worker are as low as $10,000 or $20,000, limiting the employer's risk almost as well as a regular plan.

Brokers report brisk sales of self-insured plans and this backstop stop-loss coverage. "Last year, we saw a huge uptake of self-funded or partial self-funded business," says David Fear, a Roseville, Calif., consultant who helps brokers and agents issue stop-loss coverage.

The average size of self-insured companies that Fear handles is between 25 and 30 workers, he estimates. His business for firms with fewer than 100 employees doubled in the last year, he says.

A booming business

At BSI Strategic Consulting, a Fresno, Calif., firm that helps small companies self-insure, "our business has more than doubled in the last six months," says CEO Lawrence Thompson. "There's a lot more interest in self-funding than I've seen in the last 32 years."

At insurance giant Cigna, self-coverage for small employers grew by a fifth last year, says Julie McCarter, vice president of product development for Cigna Select, which sells medical stop-loss coverage and claims processing.

"A lot of it comes down to what's going on in Washington," says Donald Drelich, CEO of D.W. Van Dyke, a Connecticut insurance consultant. "People are seeing the cost of insurance rising because of the things that are being added (under the ACA), so they're exploring other possibilities."

Self-coverage is exempt from premium taxes, which are estimated to raise prices from 2% to 4%, as well as from the health law's "essential benefit" and community rating rules. Employers such as NorthBay's Comfort say that gives them the flexibility to tailor plans for their workers.

Officials in some states are trying to limit self-coverage. California, Rhode Island and Minnesota are considering legislation that raises the point at which stop-loss insurance kicks in, reducing or eliminating small firms' ability to self-insure.

Two years ago then-New Jersey Commissioner of Banking and Insurance Thomas Considine warned stop-loss insurers to cease "selectively marketing" to small employers with young workers. He pledged to issue regulations prohibiting the practice but, following industry protests, they were never published.

Last month, the self-insurance institute formed an alliance with the National Retail Federation and other business groups to oppose such measures. If the idea behind the ACA is to increase health coverage, such groups ask, why would anybody want to limit small businesses' ability to offer self-insured plans?

"To the employers, it looks like health insurance, it feels like health insurance, and it's less costly," says David Burton, general counsel for the National Small Business Association. "Do you want to set up a situation where an IBM or a GM can be self-insured — or even a small company with 100 or 150 employees — and the smaller guys don't have that option? I don't see the logic in that."

Monday, April 1, 2013

Own a gun? Time to buy violence liability insurance, California Democrats say:

Democratic lawmakers proposed legislation Tuesday that would require California gun owners to buy liability insurance to cover damages or injuries caused by their weapons.

Similar bills have been introduced in other states after the Newtown, Conn., school massacre. They include Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and New York.

I was moved, like many others, being the father of two young children, by the Sandy Hook incident and looking for constructive ways to manage gun violence here in California as well as the rest of the country," said Assemblyman Philip Ting of San Francisco, who introduced AB231 along with Assemblyman Jimmy Gomez of Los Angeles. "There's basically a cost that is born by the taxpayers when accidents occur. ... I don't think that taxpayers should be footing those bills."

Ting equated the idea to requiring vehicle owners to buy auto insurance. Gomez said it would encourage gun owners to take firearms safety classes and keep their guns locked up to get lower insurance rates.

No state has enacted the requirement despite repeated previous attempts, said Jon Griffin, a policy analyst with the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Bills have been offered unsuccessfully in Massachusetts and New York since at least 2003, when the conference began keeping track, he said. Similar bills were proposed in Illinois in 2009 and in Pennsylvania last year. Lawmakers are introducing the bills this year in even more states after the recent shootings.

Some proposals would require buyers to show proof of insurance before they could purchase a weapon. The proposal in California would apply to anyone owning a weapon, Ting said, though the bill's details are still being worked out.

Sam Paredes, executive director of Gun Owners of California, said most gun owners already act responsibly and can be sued for damages if they don't.

He said the proposal is part of an ongoing attempt to "price gun owners out of existence," particularly the law-abiding poor who live in crime-ridden areas and need protection the most. Criminals would ignore the law, he said.

Moreover, he questioned whether it is constitutional to require someone to buy insurance to exercise a constitutional right.

"If they don't address it in committee, I'll guarantee they'll have to address it in court," Paredes said.

Ting said he and Gomez plan to work with gun owners and opponents to craft a constitutional bill. It will not require insurance companies to offer gun insurance, but will encourage them to enter the market.

He noted that the National Rifle Association itself already offers its members the chance to buy liability insurance, despite its opposition to requiring gun owners to buy such policies.

Ting also introduced AB232, which would give a state income-tax credit of up to $1,000 to anyone who turns in a firearm to a local gun buyback program. The amount of the credit would be determined based on the value of the weapon.